Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39894749›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of anaesthesia2025

Patients' perceptions of brain health after surgery: a mixed-methods study of perioperative risk communication in older surgical patients in New Zealand.

Carolyn Deng, Tanisha Jowsey, Ines Becker, Doug Campbell, Jack Hill, Jignal Bhagvandas, Ralph Fuchs, Nicholas J Lightfoot, Kaveh Djamali, Jennifer Weller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Carolyn DengDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Te Toka Tumai Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. Electronic address: carolynd@adhb.govt.nz.
Tanisha JowseyFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Ines BeckerDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Te Toka Tumai Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Doug CampbellDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Te Toka Tumai Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jack HillDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Te Toka Tumai Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jignal BhagvandasDepartment of Anaesthesia, Whangārei Hospital, Whangārei, New Zealand.
Ralph FuchsDepartment of Anaesthesia, Whangārei Hospital, Whangārei, New Zealand.
Nicholas J LightfootDepartment of Anaethesia and Pain Medicine, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Kaveh DjamaliDepartment of Anaethesia and Pain Medicine, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jennifer WellerFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe explored how adult surgical patients perceived their risk of major postoperative complications, including neurological complications, and how much information they wanted to receive about such risks.

methodsWe undertook a mixed-methods study including a 13-item survey and thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with patients undergoing noncardiac, non-neurologic surgery.

resultsOf 557 distributed surveys, 547 were returned completed. Of these, 88% of respondents had previously undergone surgery. Respondents were most likely to indicate an extreme level of concern for major stroke (64%), followed by heart attack (56%), minor stroke (46%), and cognitive decline (43%). Women were more likely to indicate a higher level of concern for cognitive decline than men (odds ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.4, P=0.015). Seventeen people participated in interviews. Six themes were identified: (1) trust in healthcare professionals; (2) surgery to achieve hopes and ambitions; (3) previous experiences govern expectations and perception of risk; (4) positive outlook and spirituality as protective factors; (5) support matters; and (6) a personalised approach to risk discussion.

conclusionsMany participants did not know the risks of major perioperative complications but based their risk perception on previous experiences and trust in health professionals. Participants focused on hope more than their concerns. Information provision should be personalised as patients expressed differences in the desired amount of information on risks.

Indexed as

CommunicationPostoperative ComplicationsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandPerioperative CareSurveys and Questionnairesbrain healthcognitionconsentdeliriumpatient experiencepostoperative riskrisk communicationstroke

Identifiers

PMID39894749
PMCPMC11947577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.