ReviewFoot and ankle clinics2025
Standardizing 3 Dimensional Measurements in Foot and Ankle Imaging: A Contemporary Review and Methodological Proposal.
Review in Foot and ankle clinics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- 3D foot and ankle radiographic measurement toolbox.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Valgus Deviation of the Intersesamoid Crista in Hallux Valgus and Its Association With the Distal Metatarsal Articular Angle: A Pilot Study.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Increasing utilization of weight-bearing computed tomography and fluoroscopy has driven the need for standardization of 3 dimensional (3D) measurements in the foot and ankle. These emerging imaging modalities are currently used to evaluate foot and ankle conditions including ankle osteoarthritis, progressive collapsing foot deformity, midfoot instability, and hallux valgus. This study aims first to provide a comprehensive review of clinical studies that have utilized these 3D methodologies. As a second goal, this study presents the methodological approach proposed by an international task force of experts toward addressing those concerns to provide validated guidelines for 3D static and dynamic measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.