ArticleBMJ open2025
Spatial and temporal changes of breast-conserving surgery rates and its influential factors among Chinese patients with breast cancer from 2013 to 2019: a registry-based study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveOur study aims to evaluate the spatial and temporal changes of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) rates and influential factors of BCS in Guangdong Province, China. DESIGN, SETTING AND
participantsThis registry-based cohort study analysed the data of patients of all age groups, from the medical record cover page, which was mandatorily collected for inpatients by the Health Administrative Department of Guangdong Province, China. Patients with non-metastatic breast cancer, who underwent breast surgery between 2013 and 2019, were included. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We analysed the BCS rate in Guangdong Province between 2013 and 2019. Logistic regression was applied to investigate the association between patient-level influential factors and BCS, respectively. We used restricted cubic spline regression to model the non-linear association between hospital volume rank with BCS rate. Linear regression was used to evaluate the association between city-level parameters with BCS rate of each city.
resultsA total of 93 521 patients with non-metastatic breast cancer, who underwent breast surgery, were included in the analyses. Among them, 10 949 (11.7%) had BCS, with the BCS rates increasing from 0.8% in 2013 to 19.2% in 2019. Patients who were older (vs <40 years, 40-49 years: adjusted OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.76; 50-59 years: 0.51, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.54; ≥60 years: 0.37, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.40) and married (vs unmarried, 0.64, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.70) were less likely to undergo BCS. Patients who were employed (vs unemployed, 1.58, 95% CI 1.49 to 1.68), received cross-city surgery (vs local surgery, 1.37, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.44), lived in a high-income city (vs low-income city, β=4.40, 95% CI 1.55 to 7.24) or in a city with a higher number of physicians per 100 000 residents (0.57, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.82) were more likely to receive BCS. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study suggests a significant increase in BCS rates from 2013 to 2019 in Guangdong, China. Promotion of BCS is needed, particularly among older patients, lower-volume hospitals and economically underdeveloped areas. Healthcare system should be prepared to support the increased awareness of seeking BCS among younger patients with breast cancer by improving the availability of radiotherapy, multidisciplinary team and patients' education programme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.