Observational studyInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2025
Use of Ursodeoxycholic Acid and the Risk of Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Elderly Patients with Viral Hepatitis.
Observational study in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical effects of ursodeoxycholic acid in COVID-19 infection: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Although the management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has improved, chemoprevention remains a challenge. We recently identified that ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is associated with subclinical infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus, implying a reduction in the severity of COVID-19. We analyzed a large medical database to assess the utility of UDCA in the reduction of COVID-19 severity. Methods This retrospective observational study was conducted using a large-scale healthcare administrative claims database. We extracted data on patients who were diagnosed with either chronic hepatitis B or C. Among them, patients ≥50 years of age diagnosed with COVID-19 before December 2022 were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: those with or without a prescription of UDCA. The primary outcome was the in-hospital mortality rate. A propensity score-matching analysis was performed using logistic regression. Results A total of 6,413 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 (UDCA group, n =579; non-UDCA group, n =5,834) were analyzed. The median age was 73.0 (interquartile range, 64.0-81.0) years, and 57.8% of the patients were men. The UDCA group had significantly more complications with liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, type 2 diabetes, and hypertension. The UDCA group had a higher in-hospital mortality rate than the non-UDCA group, even after propensity score matching (7.4% vs. 4.3%, p=0.03), whereas there was no difference in the risks of hospitalization, oxygen therapy, or ventilation. Conclusion Although the observed increase in mortality among UDCA users could have been due to unmeasured confounding factors, UDCA did not reduce the severity of COVID-19 in viral hepatitis patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.