Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39894254›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2025

Non-invasive estimation of left ventricular chamber stiffness using cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography.

Ida Marie Hauge-Iversen, Einar S Nordén, Arne Olav Melleby, Linn Espeland, Lili Zhang, Ivar Sjaastad, Emil Knut Stenersen Espe

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ida Marie Hauge-IversenInstitute for Experimental Medical Research, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: i.m.hauge-iversen@medisin.uio.no.
Einar S NordénInstitute for Experimental Medical Research, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Arne Olav MellebyInstitute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Linn EspelandInstitute for Experimental Medical Research, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Lili ZhangInstitute for Experimental Medical Research, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ivar SjaastadInstitute for Experimental Medical Research, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Emil Knut Stenersen EspeInstitute for Experimental Medical Research, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreclinical studies exploring the underlying mechanisms of elevated left ventricular (LV) chamber stiffness play a crucial role in developing new therapeutic strategies. However, there is a lack of systematic evaluation of imaging biomarkers of diastolic function against gold standard assessment of LV chamber stiffness in rodents. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate imaging biomarkers of diastolic function from cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and echocardiography in predicting the slope of the end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship (EDPVR) in rats.

methodsSprague Dawley rats with varying degrees of myocardial stiffness induced by aortic constriction (n=38) and healthy controls (n=9) underwent echocardiography and CMR at approximately 13 weeks post-operation. Imaging biomarkers of diastolic function were evaluated for their ability to predict the EDPVR slope from pressure-volume recordings using regression analysis and receiver operating characteristics analysis.

resultsBoth CMR and echocardiographic imaging biomarkers, in particular those related to the left atrium and mitral flow, were able to predict the EDPVR slope in a rat model with varying stiffness. From CMR, native T1 values, peak early diastolic longitudinal strain rate (SRe(long)) and E/SRe(long), left atrial (LA) ejection fraction, isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT), E/A and peak LA strain, correlated best with the EDPVR slope (|r|=0.54-0.72). From echocardiography, E/A, E, LA diameter, e'/a', E/SRe(long) and IVRT correlated with the EDPVR slope (|r|=0.49-0.67), while E/e', e' and E-wave deceleration time demonstrated poor correlation (|r|=0.17-0.27). Receiver operating characteristics analysis indicated better performance of CMR imaging biomarkers than echocardiography in predicting increased EDPVR slope.

conclusionsSeveral diastolic imaging biomarkers commonly employed in preclinical studies have poor ability to predict cardiac chamber stiffness. Our study identifies several imaging biomarkers obtained from both echocardiography and CMR that are able to estimate LV chamber stiffness non-invasively, providing an important tool for future mechanistic research on myocardial stiffness.

Indexed as

Echocardiography, DopplerMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineVentricular Dysfunction, LeftVentricular Function, LeftAnimalsDiastoleDisease Models, AnimalElasticityMalePredictive Value of TestsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyROC CurveStroke VolumeVentricular PressureCardiac imagingChamber stiffnessDiastolic functionImaging biomarkersPreclinical research

Identifiers

PMID39894254
PMCPMC12182815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.