Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39894050›Full record

ArticleNursing & health sciences2025

Patient Education During Hospitalization From the Perspective of Nurse Managers: A Qualitative Study.

Jessica Longhini, Elisa Ambrosi, Barbara Tescaro, Noemi Derugna, Maria Luisa Ferro, Federica Canzan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing & health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jessica LonghiniDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4198-075X
Elisa AmbrosiDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Barbara TescaroLocal Health Authority Berica, Vicenza, Italy.
Noemi DerugnaLocal Health Authority Berica, Vicenza, Italy.
Maria Luisa FerroLocal Health Authority Berica, Vicenza, Italy.
Federica CanzanDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore patient education in surgical and medical wards from the perspective of nurse managers. A qualitative descriptive study was conducted with 28 nurse managers from 34 wards in two hospitals, using content analysis. Three themes were identified. The first "Characteristics of patient education" highlights the definitions, goals, and interdisciplinary nature of patient education, emphasizing its role in promoting autonomy and safe discharge. The second "Delivering patient education" focuses on the content, methods, and timing of education. While some managers supported routine care integration, others preferred dedicated sessions, highlighting a need for flexibility in approaches. The third "Evaluating and Improving Patient Education" examines assessment strategies, outcome tracking, and quality maintenance. Effective patient education was linked to reduced readmissions and fewer support calls. Documentation was seen as both essential and burdensome. The study underscores the complexity and benefits of patient education while addressing challenges like time constraints and workload. Recommended strategies include staff training, developing educational tools, structured but flexible approaches, enhanced documentation, and fostering interprofessional collaboration.

Indexed as

HospitalizationNurse AdministratorsPatient Education as TopicAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchhospitalmultidisciplinarynurse managementpatient educationself‐care

Identifiers

PMID39894050
PMCPMC11787913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.