ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2025
Intratesticular lipoma in an elderly patient: A case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and importanceIntratesticular lipoma is a rare benign tumor of the testis, with only a few cases documented in the literature. While extra testicular lipomas are more commonly observed, their presence within the testis is unusual. Due to the rarity of intratesticular lipomas, distinguishing them from malignant testicular tumors through non-invasive methods can be challenging, often requiring histopathological confirmation. CASE PRESENTATION: A 53-year-old male with hypertension presented with testicular enlargement. A scrotal ultrasound revealed a well-circumscribed, hyperechoic mass in the left testis, indicating a likely benign condition. Tumor markers (LDH, HCG, AFP) were normal. The patient underwent a left radical orchiectomy, which revealed a 6 × 6 × 4 cm yellow mass. Histopathology confirmed it as a lipoma with no malignant features. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Ultrasonography is commonly the first imaging tool for testicular masses, offering crucial insights. In this case, the hyperechoic appearance suggested a benign nature, although malignancy could not be fully excluded preoperatively. MRI can provide further differentiation between benign and malignant masses. The differential diagnosis for such testicular masses includes lipoma, dermoid cysts, and benign entities, though malignancies like seminoma may also appear. Surgical excision with histopathological evaluation remains essential for a definitive diagnosis.
conclusionIntratesticular lipomas, although rare, can mimic malignant testicular tumors. While radical orchiectomy is often performed for definitive diagnosis, preoperative evaluations, including imaging and tumor markers, are essential for proper management. Accurate differentiation between benign and malignant testicular masses is vital to avoid unnecessary interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.