Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39893857›Full record

ArticleHeart & lung : the journal of critical care

A mixed methods study of backup behavior among interprofessional ICU teams.

Deena Kelly Costa, Kathryn A Lee, Nathan C Wright, Emily M Boltey, Hannah C Ratliff, Deanna J Marriott, Olga Yakusheva

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Heart & lung : the journal of critical care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Deena Kelly CostaYale School of Nursing, West Haven CT, USA; Yale School of Medicine, Section on Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, New Haven CT, USA. Electronic address: deena.costa@yale.edu.
Kathryn A LeeUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Nathan C WrightYale School of Nursing, West Haven CT, USA.
Emily M BolteyVA Pittsburgh Health System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Hannah C RatliffUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Deanna J MarriottUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Olga YakushevaJohns Hopkins University, School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

AHRQ HHS K08 HS024552NHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL134114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBackup behavior-when clinicians help each other via verbal assistance or task completion in their roles-is essential for effective teamwork in the intensive care unit (ICU) but is not well understood. Exploring how interprofessional team members provide backup may guide future interventions.

objectiveTo examine who, how often, why, and under what circumstances ICU clinicians provide backup in mechanical ventilation care.

methodsUsing a convergence, triangulation mixed methods design in 2 medical ICUs (2017-2019), we collected qualitative data (observation, shadowing, interviews) to understand how ICU teams provide backup; and patient-shift level surveys of ICU nurses, physicians, and respiratory therapists, to identify whom clinicians contacted for help that shift. We analyzed and compared these data to gain insight into the frequency, and circumstances surrounding ICU clinicians' requests for and receipt of backup when providing mechanical ventilation care.

resultsBackup behavior was common. Interprofessional backup (e.g. nurse to respiratory therapist) related to specific patient care tasks. Intraprofessional backup (e.g. nurse to nurse) involved team members 'checking in' to assist their colleague. Most (57%) survey respondents reported at least one interprofessional contact on day and night shifts, and approximately 25% reported at least one intraprofessional backup contact. We identified distinct backup behavior patterns on day and night shifts.

conclusionsWhile backup behavior was common, interprofessional backup focused on care aligning with professional roles whereas intraprofessional backup entailed checking-in with team members. Examining how to enhance interprofessional backup through trainings or interventions may improve how teams work and patient care.

Indexed as

Critical CareIntensive Care UnitsInterprofessional RelationsPatient Care TeamRespiration, ArtificialFemaleHumansMaleCritical careInterprofessional teamsTeamwork

Identifiers

PMID39893857
PMCPMC11949697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.