ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2025
Unraveling Human Hepatocellular Responses to PFAS and Aqueous Film-Forming Foams (AFFFs) for Molecular Hazard Prioritization and In Vivo Translation.
Article in Environmental science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative investigation of the potential of glyphosate and glyphosate-based formulations to cause oxidative stress and DNA damage in human skin and liver cell systems.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- Managing PFAS in Sewage Sludge: Exposure Pathways, Impacts, and Treatment Innovations.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs) are complex product mixtures that often contain per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) to enhance fire suppression and protect firefighters. However, PFAS have been associated with a range of adverse health effects (e.g., liver and thyroid disease and cancer), and innovative approach methods to better understand their toxicity potential and identify safer alternatives are needed. In this study, we investigated a set of 30 substances (e.g., AFFF, PFAS, and clinical drugs) using differentiated cultures of human hepatocytes (HepaRG, 2D), high-throughput transcriptomics, deep learning of cell morphology images, and liver enzyme leakage assays with benchmark dose analysis to (1) predict the potency ranges for human liver injury, (2) delineate gene- and pathway-level transcriptomic points-of-departure for molecular hazard characterization and prioritization, (3) characterize human hepatocellular response similarities to inform regulatory read-across efforts, and (4) introduce an innovative approach to translate mechanistic hepatocellular response data to predict the potency ranges for PFAS-induced hepatomegaly in vivo. Collectively, these data fill important mechanistic knowledge gaps with PFAS/AFFF and represent a scalable platform to address the thousands of PFAS in commerce for greener chemistries and next-generation risk assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.