ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Enumeration Approach to Atom-to-Atom Mapping Accelerated by Ising Computing.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemical reactions are regarded as transformations of chemical structures, and the question of which atoms in the reactants correspond to which atoms in the products has attracted chemists for a long time. Atom-to-atom mapping (AAM) is a procedure that establishes such correspondence(s) between the atoms of reactants and products in a chemical reaction. Currently, automatic AAM tools play a pivotal role in various chemoinformatics tasks. However, achieving accurate automatic AAM for complex or unknown reactions within a reasonable computation time remains a significant challenge due to the combinatorial nature of the problem and the difficulty in applying appropriate reaction rules. In this study, we propose a rule-free AAM algorithm, which enumerates all atom-to-atom correspondences that minimize the number of bond cleavages and formations during the reaction. To reduce the computational burden associated with the combinatorial optimization (i.e., minimizing bond changes), we introduce Ising computing, a computing paradigm that has gained significant attention for its efficiency in solving hard combinatorial optimization problems. We found that our Ising computing framework outperforms conventional combinatorial optimization algorithms in terms of computation times, making it feasible to solve the AAM problem without reaction rules in an acceptable time. Furthermore, our AAM algorithm successfully found the correct AAM solution for all problems in a benchmark data set. In contrast, conventional AAM algorithms based on chemical heuristics failed for several problems. Specifically, these algorithms either failed to find the optimal solution in terms of bond changes, or they identified only one optimal solution, which was incorrect when multiple optimal solutions exist. These results emphasize the importance of enumerating all optimal correspondences that minimize bond changes, which is effectively achieved by our Ising-computing framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.