ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2025
The impact of breast surgery and systemic therapy on the survival of patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Refining the role of surgery in de novo stage IV breast cancer: the need for biomarkers and mechanistic insights.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSystemic therapy (ST) is essential for de novo stage IV breast cancer (BC). Stage IV BCs are highly heterogeneous, and it seems inappropriate to treat all de novo stage IV BCs equally. The survival benefit of surgery for primary sites in patients with de novo stage IV BC remains inconclusive. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe investigated 220 patients with clinical de novo stage IV BC. The relationship between primary site surgery and overall survival (OS) was analyzed. Factors such as tumor subtype, timing of surgery, and efficacy of ST were also evaluated.
resultsThe median follow-up time was 37.9 (0.5-201.7) months. In the total cohort, the median OS of the patients with and without primary site surgery was 70.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 58.4-107.3) and 42.7 months (95% CI 35.7-48.8), respectively. The OS was significantly longer in patients who underwent primary site surgery, especially in the hormone receptor (HR) + /HER2- and HER2 + subtypes, but not in the triple-negative subtype. OS prolongation was significant in patients who underwent surgery ≥ 24 months after the first diagnosis and in whom the first-line ST was effective for ≥ 24 months. Primary site surgery was a good prognostic factor in both univariate and multivariate analyses.
conclusionsThe OS was significantly longer in patients with de novo stage IV BC who underwent primary site surgery than in those who did not undergo surgery. Our results suggest that the tumor subtypes, efficacy of ST, and timing of surgery influenced the benefits of surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.