Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39893590›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2025

End-To-End Deep Learning Explains Antimicrobial Resistance in Peak-Picking-Free MALDI-MS Data.

Johan K Lassen, Palle Villesen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Johan K LassenBioinformatics Research Center, Aarhus University Universitetsbyen 81, 3. Building 1872, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0452-566X
Palle VillesenBioinformatics Research Center, Aarhus University Universitetsbyen 81, 3. Building 1872, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass spectrometry is used to determine infectious microbial species in thousands of clinical laboratories across the world. The vast amount of data allows modern data analysis methods that harvest more information and potentially answer new questions. Here, we present an end-to-end deep learning model for predicting antibiotic resistance using raw matrix assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) data. We used a 1-dimensional convolutional neural network to model (almost) raw data, skipping conventional peak-picking and directly predict resistance. The model's performance is state-of-the-art, having AUCs between 0.93 and 0.99 in all antimicrobial resistance phenotypes and validates across time and location. Feature attribution values highlight important insights into the model and how the end-to-end workflow can be improved further. This study showcases that reliable resistance phenotyping using MALDI-MS data is attainable and highlights the gains of using end-to-end deep learning for spectrometry data.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDeep LearningDrug Resistance, BacterialSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNeural Networks, ComputerAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID39893590
PMCPMC11824369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.