ArticleJapanese journal of clinical oncology2025
Real-world clinical usage and efficacy of apalutamide in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a multi-institutional study in the CsJUC.
Article in Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the real-world clinical usage and effectiveness of apalutamide in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC).
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data of 186 men who received apalutamide across 17 institutions. The primary outcomes were the clinical usage of apalutamide for nmCRPC: prior usage of other androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs), prior radical treatment, and the distribution of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time (PSA-DT) at the initial administration of apalutamide. The secondary outcomes were the efficacy of apalutamide: PSA response (50% or 90% decline), progression-free survival, and skin-adverse events (AEs).
resultsWe identified 75 patients with nmCRPC. A total of 31 (41.3%) patients received prior treatment with other ARSIs. A total of 42 men (56%) did not receive any prior radical treatment. The PSA-DT was <3.0, 3.0-5.9, 6.0-10, and > 10 months in 34.7%, 40%, 14.7%, and 10.6% of the patients, respectively. Patients receiving prior treatment with other ARSIs showed a significantly lower PSA response (PSA 50% decline, 88.4% vs. 18.8%; PSA 90% decline, 60.5% vs. 6.2%, P < .001, respectively) and significantly shorter progression-free survival (median: 37 months vs. 4 months; log-rank P < .001) than those without prior ARSI treatment, although cancer status did not differ between the groups. Skin-AEs were observed in 42.7%.
conclusionsThis real-world study revealed that apalutamide was used for the treatment after other ARSIs in >40% of patients with nmCRPC and showed limited efficacy in this context, although the effectiveness of apalutamide without prior other ARSI treatment was comparable with that reported in clinical trial results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.