Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39893489›Full record

Observational studyArthritis research & therapy2025

Predicting abatacept retention using machine learning.

Rieke Alten, Claire Behar, Pierre Merckaert, Ebenezer Afari, Virginie Vannier-Moreau, Anael Ohayon, Sean E Connolly, Aurélie Najm, Pierre-Antoine Juge, Gengyuan Liu and 3 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Arthritis research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02090556 completednot on this map

Long-term Experience With Abatacept SC in Routine Clinical Practice

TypeobservationalSponsorBristol-Myers SquibbRan2013 to 2019Enrolled2,954ConditionsRheumatoid Arthritis
NCT02109666 completednot on this map

Long Term Experience With Abatacept in Routine Clinical Practice

TypeobservationalSponsorBristol-Myers SquibbRan2008 to 2016Enrolled2,364ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsAbatacept
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Rieke AltenSchlosspark-Klinik University, Berlin, Germany. Rieke.alten@schlosspark-klinik.de.
Claire BeharTulsy, Paris, France.
Pierre MerckaertData Revenue GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Ebenezer AfariPrivate Practice, Lyon, France.
Virginie Vannier-MoreauBristol Myers Squibb, Rueil-Malmaison, France.
Anael OhayonBristol Myers Squibb, Rueil-Malmaison, France.
Sean E ConnollyBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Aurélie NajmSchool of Infection and Immunity, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Pierre-Antoine JugeUniversité de Paris, AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat Claude-Bernard, Paris, France.
Gengyuan LiuBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Angshu RaiBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Yedid ElbezSignifience, Puteaux, France.
Karissa LozenskiBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incorporation of machine learning is becoming more prevalent in the clinical setting. By predicting clinical outcomes, machine learning can provide clinicians with a valuable tool for refining precision medicine approaches and improving treatment outcomes.

methodsThis was a post hoc analysis of pooled patient-level data from the global, real-world ACTION and ASCORE trials in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initiating abatacept. Patient demographic and disease characteristics were input across 10 machine learning models used to predict 12-month treatment retention. Retention was defined as treatment for > 365 days or ≤ 365 days in patients who achieved remission or major clinical response (based on European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology response criteria). The pooled dataset was split into a training/validation cohort for model development and a test cohort for an unbiased evaluation of performance. SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) values determined the level of importance and directionality for key patient features predicting abatacept retention.

resultsThe pooled ACTION and ASCORE dataset included 5320 patients with RA (mean [standard deviation] age 57.7 [12.7] years; 79% female). The 12-month abatacept retention rate was 61% (n = 3236) with a discontinuation rate of 39% (n = 2037). In the training set (n = 4218), the gradient-boosting classifier model demonstrated the best performance (testing accuracy: 62%). This model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (95% confidence interval) of 0.620 (0.586, 0.653) and F1 score of 0.659 (0.625, 0.689) in the test set of patients (n = 1055). Using this model, the five most important variables predicting 12-month abatacept retention were low body mass index (BMI), low American College of Rheumatology functional status class, anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) positivity, low Patient Global Assessment, and younger age.

conclusionsThe gradient-boosting classifier model identified key patient features predictive of abatacept retention from this large, real-world study population. The SHAP values conveyed the directionality and importance of BMI, functional status, ACPA serostatus, Patient Global Assessment, and age for abatacept retention. Findings are consistent with previous observations and help validate the machine learning approach for predictive modelling in RA treatment, and may help inform clinical decision making.

trial registrationNCT02109666 (ACTION), NCT02090556 (ASCORE).

Indexed as

AbataceptAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidMachine LearningAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAbataceptAntirheumatic AgentsAbataceptMachine learningRetentionRheumatoid arthritisTreatment response

Identifiers

PMID39893489
PMCPMC11786492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.