ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2025
Effect of visceral fat area on prognosis of patients undergoing radical gastrectomy and construction of nomogram.
Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative contributions of visceral adiposity and muscle-related parameters to postoperative complications after gastrectomy: a domain-based analysis.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Visceral adiposity rather than BMI predicts overall survival after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study with age-stratified analyses.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe aim to investigate the impact of visceral fat area (VFA) on the prognosis of patients following radical gastric resection and develop a nomogram prediction model to forecast the prognosis of gastric cancer patients.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 156 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer in the 900th hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force from April 2018 to April 2020. We collected the CT image data and clinicopathological data one week prior to the operation and then used software to calculate the VFA, dividing it into two groups: a low VFA group (n = 71) and a high VFA group (n = 85). We compared the clinicopathological characteristics and early postoperative complications of the two groups. The Pearson χ
resultsThe results of CT showed that VFA value was (95.89 ± 41.40) cm², and body mass index (BMI) was positively correlated with VFA value (r = 0.291, P < 0.001). The ROC curve shows that VFA can predict the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer significantly better than BMI (AUC = 0.826 vs. AUC = 0.707, P = 0.016). The incidence of incision fat liquefaction, pancreatic fistula, and abdominal infection in the high VFA group was higher than that in the low VFA group (P < 0.05). We followed up with all patients for 0.5-48.5 months, with a median follow-up time of 30 months. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to draw the survival curve. The results showed that the overall survival rate of patients in the high VFA group was significantly higher than that in the low VFA group (χ
conclusionsAge, differentiation degree, postoperative complications, VFA, ASA grading, and TNM staging are independent influencing factors for the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. The constructed nomogram has excellent prediction accuracy and is helpful to evaluate the prognosis of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.