SynthesisJournal of health, population, and nutrition2025
Food taboo practices and associated factors among pregnant women in Sub-Sahara Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relationship of MicroRNA-146a rs2910164 SNP and tobacco consumption with the susceptibility of digestive system cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEven though maternal nutrition has improved, food taboos and poor dietary practices during pregnancy can still lead to nutrient deficiencies, increasing the risk of complications for both mothers and children. Therefore, this study aimed to generate pooled evidence from across different countries in Sub-Saharan Africa to inform effective prevention actions. This meta-analysis aims to determine the pooled prevalence of food taboo practices and identify associated factors among pregnant women in Sub-Saharan Africa.
methodsThis study systematically reviewed relevant articles and reports from databases including Embase, MEDLINE, Science Direct, PubMed, Google, and Google Scholar. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessed article quality. Data extraction and analysis were done using Excel and STATA 17, respectively. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and the I
resultsA total of fifty-eight studies with 20,262 pregnant women were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled proportion of food taboo practices reported by the 58 studies was 41% (95% CI: 34, 48%). In the subgroup analysis, the pooled proportion of food taboo practices for studies conducted in urban areas was 40% (95% CI: 32, 48%), while it was 43% (95% CI: 32, 56%) among rural residents. Factors associated with food taboo practices among pregnant women included being unable to read and write (AOR = 2.64%; 95% CI: 1.79-3.90; I
conclusionAccording to this review, over two out of every five pregnant mothers practiced food taboos in the region. The educational status of the mother, antenatal care follow-up, and maternal nutrition knowledge were factors affecting food taboo practices among pregnant women. Therefore, emphasis should be given to the uptake of antenatal care follow-up to improve maternal nutrition knowledge and nutritional status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.