ArticleEye and vision (London, England)2025
Influence of preoperative variables on the 3-month functional outcomes of the Vivity extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens: a prospective case series.
Article in Eye and vision (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical outcomes of a new presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens with spiral optic.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Influence of angle kappa and angle alpha on visual outcomes after implantation of a nondiffractive extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lens: a prospective observation study.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- An Update on Intraocular Lens Technology for Presbyopia Correction and Visual Outcomes.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Simulated vs. real visual performance of an EDOF intraocular lens using adaptive optics technology.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Observational
- Comparative Photopic and Mesopic Visual Performance of Enhanced Monofocal Versus Non-Diffractive Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Bilateral implantation of extended depth of focus intraocular lens in patients with early or intermediate age-related macular degeneration.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Comparative Visual Performance and Optical Stability of Clareon Vivity and TECNIS PureSee EDoF IOLs in Cataract Patients.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Satisfaction and Visual Outcomes with a Non-Diffractive EDOF IOL in Post-Myopic LASIK and PRK Patients with High Corneal Spherical Aberration.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Factors that affect distance-corrected near visual acuity in partial range of focus intraocular lenses.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Assessment of vivity with French clinical data related to the toric model study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Navigating the Lens Labyrinth: A Practical Approach to Intraocular Lens Classification and Selection.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate the functional results of the AcrySof IQ Vivity (Alcon, Fort Worth, TX) extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens (EDoF-IOL) and explore correlations between the preoperative biometric parameters and the postoperative functional outcomes.
methodsIn a prospective, single-center, non-randomized study, axial length, keratometry, anterior chamber depth, scotopic and photopic pupil diameters, pupil decentration, corneal asphericity, corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs), coma and spherical aberration were measured preoperatively. The EDoF-IOL was implanted bilaterally. Three months postoperatively, manifest refraction, monocular and binocular uncorrected and corrected visual acuity at 4 m, 66 cm and 40 cm, binocular defocus curve, binocular contrast sensitivity, halometry and Strehl ratio were measured. Visual disturbances and spectacle independence were assessed with McAlinden and IOLSAT questionnaires, respectively. Assuming a minimum Pearson r correlation coefficient between variables of 0.5 with a power of 80% and a P value less than 0.05, a minimum sample size of 29 (58 eyes) cases was required.
resultsForty-three patients were enrolled. Binocular distance corrected visual acuity was lower than 0.1 logMAR for a defocus between + 1.0 and - 1.5 D. The mean values at 66 cm and 40 cm were - 0.07 ± 0.06 and 0.19 ± 0.13 logMAR, respectively. McAlinden's questionnaire revealed mean scores close to zero for all questions. The IOLSAT questionnaire showed that spectacles were never used for distance and intermediate vision. Regression analysis did not disclose any significant correlation between the preoperatively measured variables and the postoperative outcomes, with a few exceptions: preoperative higher order corneal aberrations were correlated to halometry area (r
conclusionsIn healthy unoperated eyes, the visual outcomes for this EDoF-IOL are independent of most of the patients' preoperative parameters. Attention should be paid to preoperative corneal aberrations and asphericity, which did not lead to visual disturbances, but may be potential sources of halo and reduced contrast sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.