ArticleBMC pediatrics2025
Comparison of growth hormone therapy response according to the presence of growth hormone deficiency in children born small for gestational age with short stature in Korea: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of children with bioinactive growth hormone, small for gestational age, and idiopathic short stature.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Differences in growth in prepubertal children with definite growth hormone deficiency, short stature unresponsive to stimulation tests, and idiopathic short stature treated with recombinant human growth hormone: a retrospective study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to compare the response to growth hormone (GH) therapy according to the presence of GH deficiency (GHD) in short-stature children born small for gestational age (SGA) in Korea and to present appropriate GH dose criteria.
methodsWe evaluated 27 children born SGA with short stature and GHD (GHD group) and 23 without GHD (non-GHD group) registered in the LG Growth Study. Growth responses and changes in GH dose over a 2-year GH therapy period were compared, and the factors affecting growth response were investigated.
resultsThe standard deviation scores (SDSs) for baseline weight and body mass index (BMI) were significantly lower in boys without GHD than in boys with GHD. The SDS for insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) was lower among boys without GHD than among boys with GHD, while the SDS for insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) was higher among girls without GHD than among girls with GHD; however, there was no significant difference when comparing all children with GHD to those without GHD. Regardless of the presence of GHD, the difference between chronological age and bone age decreased annually. Notably, there was significantly rapid bone age progression among patients without GHD. The findings showed differences in GH dose according to GHD starting from the 2nd year of therapy, with the non-GHD group receiving a significantly higher dose. Regarding the factors affecting growth response, younger age and bone age, higher height SDS, BMI SDS and MPH SDS were related to higher growth response (Δheight SDS and Δgrowth velocity), but there was no statistically significant correlation.
conclusionGHD is rare among children born SGA. Nonetheless, if there are any signs of decreased growth velocity or hypopituitarism, the presence of GHD should be assessed before GH therapy, and personalized therapy based on the results is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.