ArticleBMC oral health2025
Impact of simulated gastric acid on the physical and mechanical properties of vacuum-formed retainers: an in vitro study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of flash-free polymeric adhesive on enamel surface after orthodontic bracket debonding under simulated cariogenic and gastric acid conditions.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA decrease in oral pH levels may have detrimental effects on vacuum-formed retainers since an acidic oral environment could impact the mechanical and physical properties of these retainers. The present In vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of simulated gastric acid at pH 4 and 1.2 on the surface microhardness, flexural strength, and color change of three different types of orthodontic retainer materials.
methodsA total of 144 vacuum-formed commercially available retainer materials: copolyesters, polypropylene, and PET-G (n = 48/group) were evaluated. Each specimen was immersed in distilled water, and then the specimens were divided into two subgroups: those with a pH of 4 and those with a pH of 1.2. The microhardness test was performed using Innovatest, the flexural strength was evaluated by a universal testing machine, and the color change was analyzed using a spectrophotometer. The data were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA and independent sample t test at a significance value of P ≤ 0.05.
resultsOur findings indicated a significant decrease in flexural strength in all the experimental groups after immersion in pH 1.2 and 4 solutions (P < 0.001), with PET-G being the most affected material, followed by copolyester and polypropylene. Only copolyester demonstrated a significant decrease in surface microhardness following immersion in a pH 4 solution (P = 0.025). All materials exhibited the greatest degree of color alteration CP (P = 0.006), PP (P = 0.001), and PET-G (P = 0.009) respectively.
conclusionThe study concluded that copolyester adversely affects flexural strength, surface microhardness, and color when subjected to immersion in simulated gastric acid. Therefore, care is recommended for patients diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.