ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
A spontaneous anterior fusion of lumbar spine after posterolateral lumbar fusion with pedicle screw-plate system.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLumbar posterolateral fusion (PLF) with Pedicle Screw-Plate (PSP) fixation without interbody fusion found spontaneous anterior fusion (SAF). No study has reported the SAF of lumbar spine in patients who underwent PLF. This study reports the rate of SAF of lumbar spine after PLF with PSP system compared with the rate of SAF after PLF with pedicle screw-rod (PSR) system.
methodsRetrospective reviews of charts and radiographs were performed in 111 patients who underwent PLF with PSP system and PSR system for treatment of degenerative lumbar spine. Demographic data, diagnosis, Meyerding grading, level of fusion, Pfirrmann grading, disc height, pedicle screw depth, follow-up time and SAF were compared between PSP and PSR groups.
resultsFifty-five patients in the PSP group and 56 patients in the PSR group were included with similar baseline characteristics. There were more degenerative spondylolisthesis patients in the PSP group compared with patients in the PSR group. However, there was no significant difference of Pfirrmann grading in both groups. Fifteen patients (27.3%) in the PSP group developed SAF while no patient in the PSR group had SAF. When patients in the PSP group were analyzed, the mean follow-up time in patients with SAF was significantly longer than the no SAF group.
conclusionThis study has reported SAF of lumbar spine in patients who underwent PLF with the PSP system. The SAF increasingly occurred with longer follow-up time. In this study, no SAF was found in patients who underwent PLF with the PSR system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.