ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Modified minimally invasive chevron osteotomy versus traditional incision chevron osteotomy.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A comparative study of distal chevron osteotomy and minimally invasive surgery for surgical correction of hallux valgus deformity.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to compare modified minimally invasive chevron osteotomy (MIC group) and traditional incision chevron osteotomy (TIC group) for correction of mild to moderate hallux valgus deformity.
methodsThis retrospective study enrolled 42 patients (60 feet) with mild to moderate hallux valgus deformities who were treated with modified MIC osteotomy or TIC osteotomy between January 2020 and June 2021. The patients were divided into the MIC and TIC groups according to whether the treatment received was minimally invasive. The MIC group included 20 patients (28 feet), comprising 1 male and 19 female patients; aged 37.15 ± 14.60 years, with mild hallux valgus deformity in 12 cases (14 feet) and moderate hallux valgus deformity in 8 cases (14 feet). In the TIC group comprising 22 patients (32 feet), including 1 male and 21 female patients, aged 40.95 ± 11.60 years, mild and moderate hallux valgus deformities were observed in 10 (18 feet) and 12 cases (14 feet), respectively. Preoperatively and at the last follow-up, the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux, lesser toe score, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain were used to evaluate clinical efficacy. The hallux valgus angle (HVA), 1-2 metatarsal angle (1-2IMA), and distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA) were measured and compared on the weight-bearing X-ray film of the foot preoperatively and postoperatively. At the last follow-up, recurrence of hallux valgus deformity, hallux adduction deformity, metatarsal head necrosis, metastatic plantar pain, and other complications were recorded.
resultsAll 42 patients were followed up, and the follow-up time of the MIC group was 24.70 ± 6.63 months; The follow-up time of the TIC group was 22.82 ± 6.12 months, and there was no significant difference in follow-up time between the two groups (P > 0.05). One patient in the MIC group experienced pain in the dorsal side of the front foot postoperatively; one patient in the TIC group had a superficial infection of the incision postoperatively. There were no significant differences in age, gender, side classification, course of the disease, degree of hallux valgus deformity, and postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). The AOFAS scores, VAS, HVA, 1-2IMA, and DMAA in the MIC group improved from 54.61 ± 7.60, 4.50 ± 0.79, 28.38° ± 5.02°, 12.88° ± 1.50°, 12.03° ± 1.88°preoperatively to 89.93 ± 4.96, 2.04 ± 1.10, 10.27° ± 1.68°, 7.49° ± 0.95° and 7.83° ± 1.33° at the last follow-up, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); the AOFAS score, VAS, HVA, 1-2IMA, and DMAA of the TIC group improved from 57.31 ± 7.59, 4.34 ± 0.70, 28.45° ± 4.47°, 12.88° ± 1.50°, 12.16° ± 1.81° preoperatively to 87.97 ± 5.96, 2.00 ± 1.11, 10.99° ± 2.25°, 7.49° ± 0.95°, and 8.25° ± 1.12° at the last follow-up, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in AOFAS score, VAS, HVA, 1-2IMA, and DMAA between the two groups (P > 0.05). The incision length of the MIC group was 2.06 ± 0.20 cm, and the incision length of the TIC group was 5.04 ± 0.54 cm, which was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
conclusionWhether it is modified minimally invasive chevron osteotomy or traditional incision chevron osteotomy, mild and moderate hallux valgus deformity is effectively treated, and the clinical efficacy and imaging results after surgery are significantly improved. Compared with traditional incision chevron osteotomy, the modified minimally invasive chevron osteotomy has a smaller incision and less trauma for mild to moderate hallux valgus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.