ArticleBMC medical education2025
Assessment of healthcare providers' knowledge, attitude, and practice toward medical research in southwest Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of pre-hospital emergency medical care practitioners regarding sepsis recognition: a cross-sectional study in Qatar.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Parental knowledge, attitudes, and practices on probiotic use in preschool children in Serbia: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical research plays a crucial role in advancing the treatment and prevention of diseases, in addition to enhancing public health.
objectivesThis study aims to assess knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of healthcare providers (HCPs) in relation to medical research, identify motivating factors and barriers that prevent them from conducting research, and identify associated factors with good knowledge, practice and positive attitude.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, a validated questionnaire was employed to gather data of HCPs who work at healthcare institutions affiliated with MOH. The Proportionate stratified random sampling method was used to recruit HCPS. Proportion (%), and median and interquartile range (IQR) were used to represent the data. Logistic regression analysis was carried out to identify associated factors with good knowledge, positive attitude, and good practice.
resultsA total of 285 HCPs were included in the analysis. The median score for knowledge was 43%, with scores ranging from 14 to 57%, for most participants showing variability in their knowledge levels. For attitude, the median score was 100%, indicating a generally positive outlook, with scores between 80% and 100% for most participants. The practice score had a median of 59%, with scores ranging from 33 to 83%, showing a wide range in research activity among the HCPS. The most reported motivators were strength of the resume (91.80%) and fulfilment of work requirements (90.80%). The most reported barriers were lack of financial support (82.3%), poor time management (78.7%), no enough research facilities (75.2%), lack of motivation (74.8%), inadequate skills and knowledge (72.3%), and lack of rewards (71.6%). Good knowledge was significantly associated with taken research methodology course (p. value = 0.001) and qualification (p. values = < 0.05). Positive attitude was significantly associated with workplace and qualification. Nationality (p. value = 0.005) and taking a research methodology course (p. value = 0.001) were significantly associated with good practice.
conclusionAlthough HCPs showed a positive attitude towards medical research, their knowledge and practice were inadequate. They are necessarily needed for amelioration. This improvement can be achieved through effective and regular research methodology courses, workshops, and enhancement of the research environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.