ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Influencing factors of the outcome of patients with haemophilia after knee replacement-a retrospective study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the factors that affect the efficacy of knee replacement surgery in hemophiliacs.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 87 patients with hemophilia (PWH) (117knees) who underwent knee arthroplasty in our hospital from January 2012 to December 2020 (mean follow-up 70.8 ± 22 months). General information, hemophilia information, surgical information, follow-up information and psychological assessment information were collected. The knee joint efficacy was evaluated using the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score, the American Knee Society's Clinical (KSC) and Functional (KSF) scores, flexion contracture degree (FC), range of motion (ROM), and wound healing. The excellent and poor groups were divided based on these factors. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze factors that may affect the knee joint efficacy of patients.
resultsSeventy-four cases of excellent knee joints and 43 cases of poor knee joints were included. Single factor analysis: The pre-ROM, SF-12MCS, HSS, KSF, and KSC of the excellent group were significantly higher than those of the poor group (P < 0.05); the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), Preoperative Visual Analogue Scale(Pre-VAS), pre-FC degree of the excellent group were significantly lower than those of the poor group (P < 0.05). The proportion of patients undergoing Simultaneous bilateral knee replacement, severe hemophilia, and quadricepsplasty during surgery in the excellent group was significantly lower than that in the poor group (P < 0.05). Logistic regression: Pre-ROM and Simultaneous bilateral knee replacement are independent risk factors affecting knee joint efficacy. Pre-ROM is positively correlated with knee joint efficacy, while Simultaneous bilateral knee replacement is negatively correlated.
conclusionIn PWH, the efficacy of knee replacement surgery is related to preoperative ROM and Simultaneous bilateral knee replacement. Better preoperative knee joint mobility is associated with improved outcomes, whereas Simultaneous bilateral knee replacement negatively impacts surgical efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.