Trial reportAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Adjuvant Pembrolizumab in Stage II Melanoma: Outcomes by Primary Tumor Location in the Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III KEYNOTE-716 Trial.
Trial report in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03553836 (Adjuvant Therapy With Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo in Resected High-risk Stage II Melanoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Adjuvant Therapy With Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo in Resected High-risk Stage II Melanoma: A Randomized, Double-blind Phase 3 Study (KEYNOTE-716)
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors across solid tumors: a meta-analysis of phase II-III randomized trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Adjuvant Therapy for High-Risk Stage II Cutaneous Melanoma: Insights and Future Directions.Cancers · 2026Review
- Individualized mRNA Vaccines in Melanoma-Where Do We Stand?Vaccines · 2025Review
- Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Stage IIB/IIC Melanoma: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious results from the KEYNOTE-716 trial demonstrated significantly improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) with adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in patients with resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma. We present a post hoc analysis of efficacy according to primary tumor location.
methodsKEYNOTE-716 (NCT03553836) is a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, phase III study. Patients aged ≥ 12 years with newly diagnosed, resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma (sentinel node-negative) were randomly assigned (1:1) to pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (2 mg/kg up to 200 mg for pediatric patients) or placebo. This post hoc analysis evaluated RFS and DMFS by primary tumor location of the head/neck, trunk, or extremities.
resultsOverall, 976 patients were assigned to pembrolizumab (n = 487) or placebo (n = 489). Median follow-up was 39.4 months (range 26.0-51.4). The hazard ratios {HRs (95% confidence interval [CI])} for RFS were 0.60 (0.38-0.93) for the head/neck subgroup, 0.57 (0.38-0.84) for the trunk subgroup, and 0.69 (0.47-1.02) for the extremities subgroup. The HRs (95% CI) for DMFS were 0.65 (0.37-1.14) for the head/neck subgroup, 0.59 (0.38-0.92) for the trunk subgroup, and 0.53 (0.31-0.90) for the extremities subgroup.
conclusionRFS and DMFS consistently favored adjuvant pembrolizumab over placebo in most subgroups analyzed in this post hoc analysis from the KEYNOTE-716 trial. These results support the benefit of adjuvant pembrolizumab on RFS and DMFS in patients with resected high-risk stage II melanoma, irrespective of primary tumor location.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39893343What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.