ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Using Moderately Hypofractionated Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Versus Upfront Surgery for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safety and pathological impact of resection after high-dose PBT for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (R-PDAC) remains unclear. This study was designed to evaluate neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy by using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (NAC-IMRT) for R-PDAC compared with upfront surgery (UpS).
methodsAmong 198 patients with R-PDAC who were indicated for resection between 2013 and 2021, 130 were included in this study after excluding patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and did not meet the NAC-IMRT criteria (Eligible set). NAC-IMRT was planned for 58 patients, and UpS was planned for 72 patients. Additionally, in 105 patients who could undergo the planned treatment (As-treated set), the surgical, pathological, and oncological outcomes were evaluated.
resultsIn the Eligible set, median overall survival (OS) was 50.5 months with NAC-IMRT and 34.7 months with UpS and progression-free survival was 20.4 months with NAC-IMRT and 13.9 months with UpS. In the As-treated set, OS was longer in the NAC-IMRT group (66.7 months vs. 34.7 months, p = 0.007). On multivariate analysis, NAC-IMRT was identified as an independent factor for better OS (hazard ratio 0.617, 95% confidence interval 0.382-0.995, p = 0.047, in the Eligible set). The incidence of postoperative complications did not show a difference between the two groups, and NAC-IMRT suppressed local tumor invasion, including lymphatic, venous, perineural invasion, and lymph node metastases.
conclusionsNAC-IMRT may offer superior survival outcomes and manageable toxicity in R-PDAC patients compared with upfront surgery. This study supports the efficacy and safety of NAC-IMRT and recommends its consideration in R-PDAC treatment protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.