ReviewPediatric research2025
Opportunities in the translational pipeline for pediatric brain cancer therapies.
Review in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging Dog Models to Uncover Human Cancer Insights.Research square · 2026Article
- Targeting the tumor microenvironment in pediatric gliomas: Advances and future directions in immunotherapy.Neuro-oncology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumors are the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the pediatric population. Moreover, survivors often experience significant long-term treatment-related morbidity. Challenges unique to drug delivery to the central nervous system have hampered therapeutic progress. In the past decade, significant advancements in our understanding of molecular biology, genetic alterations, and the tumor microenvironment have allowed us to improve our in vitro and laboratory animal models to better replicate diseases seen in the pediatric population. Recently, a comparative approach using naturally-occurring CNS malignancies in dogs with similar disease progression, histologic presentation, and treatment response has been proposed as an enticing model system. Given these improvements in the translational pipeline, there is an opportunity to identify and implement effective therapies more efficiently to pediatric CNS malignancy populations. IMPACT: Relevant and translational pre-clinical studies are needed to find chemotherapeutics and targeted agents that can reach therapeutic doses within tumors in children without causing systemic adverse effects. A discussion of comparative oncology is provided with the intent to foster veterinary/human oncology collaboration. While the traditional pipeline for translating medications from bench to bedside has been evolving and improving over the last decade, the advances and remaining roadblocks of this pipeline are reviewed and discussed in this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.