Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39893263›Full record

SynthesisArchives of dermatological research2025

Surgical outcomes of Adenoid cystic carcinoma treated with Mohs Micrographic Surgery and excision: a systematic review.

Neha Arora, Ashley Wittmer, Mojahed Mohammad K Shalabi, Frank Jing, Umer Nadir, Benjamin F Kelley, Stanislav N Tolkachjov

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Neha AroraTexas A&M School of Medicine, Dallas, TX, USA.
Ashley WittmerTexas A&M School of Medicine, Dallas, TX, USA.
Mojahed Mohammad K ShalabiDepartment of Dermatology, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center, Temple, TX, USA.
Frank JingDepartment of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.
Umer NadirHenry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA. Unadir1@hfhs.org.
Benjamin F KelleyBighorn Mohs Surgery and Dermatology Center, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Stanislav N TolkachjovTexas A&M School of Medicine, Dallas, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a rare cancer that most commonly occurs in the salivary glands, making up approximately 2-4% of all head and neck malignancies. Treatment for ACC varies, with combinations of surgical excision, adjuvant radiotherapy, and chemotherapy reported in the literature. In this study, we aim to assess ACC recurrence rates with Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) treatment compared to traditional wide local excision (WLE). In June of 2024, a comprehensive review of the literature was performed using the following keywords: "Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma" and/or "Mohs Micrographic Surgery" and/or "MMS" and/or "excision." Between the two databases, 25 articles were identified which included a total of 30 patients. Among all the articles, 30 procedures were documented - 8 MMS and 22 WLE. Patients with ACC treated with WLE had a higher rate of recurrence (40.9%) compared to those treated with MMS (12.5%). Limitations include a small number of tumors treated and reporting bias. MMS for the treatment of ACC demonstrated a decreased recurrence rate compared to WLE. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm the benefit of MMS over WLE.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Adenoid CysticMohs SurgeryNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSalivary Gland NeoplasmsHumansTreatment OutcomeAdenoid cystic carcinomaAdnexal neoplasmAdnexal tumorMohs micrographic surgeryWide local excision

Identifiers

PMID39893263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.