ArticleScientific reports2025
Bone health in newly diagnosed female breast cancer patients in China: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A multicenter prospective matched comparative study on osteoporosis risk in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone health problem is one of the important concomitant diseases of breast cancer (BC). This study aimed to investigate the bone health status of newly diagnosed female BC patients in China. A total of 636 newly diagnosed female BC patients and 268 women undergoing routine physical examinations (control group) were included. Bone mineral density and bone metabolism parameters were assessed. The association between BC and abnormal bone mass (ABM) was analyzed by logistic regression. We found that approximately 15.3% of BC patients presented with hypocalcemia after albumin adjustment. 25-OHVitD deficiency or insufficiency was observed in 92.3% of BC patients. ABM was identified in 63.2% of BC patients, comprising 36.4% with osteopenia and 26.8% with osteoporosis. ABM prevalence was significantly higher in BC patients under 40 years old (40.8%) compared to 8% in the age-matched control group. The severity of bone loss correlated with elevated bone turnover markers. Logistic regression analysis showed that a 5.5-fold and 3.4-fold increased risk of ABM and osteoporosis, respectively, in newly diagnosed BC patients versus the control group. All BC subtypes were associated with a markedly higher risk of ABM. Young BC patients (< 45 years) exhibited a nearly 9-fold higher risk of ABM compared to their age-matched counterparts. Vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency, osteopenia, and osteoporosis were highly prevalent among newly diagnosed female BC patients. Regardless of age and BC subtype, BC patients face a higher risk of ABM compared to those physical examination women, especially among the young.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.