Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39893227›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

The effectiveness of orthodontic treatment with clear aligners in different thicknesses.

Saniye Merve Cengiz, Merve Goymen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06504498 (The Effectiveness of Orthodontic Treatment With Clear Aligners in Different Thicknesses), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06504498 nacompletednot on this map

The Effectiveness of Orthodontic Treatment With Clear Aligners in Different Thicknesses

TypeinterventionalSponsorMersin UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled28ConditionsAngle's Class I Malocclusion, Crowding, ToothArms0.5 mm-thick Duran® clear aligner, 0.75 mm-thick Duran® clear aligner
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. All-In-One Iontronic Sensing Aligner for High-Precision 3D Orthodontic Force Monitoring.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Saniye Merve CengizFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Mersin University, Ciftlikkoy Campus, Yenisehir, Mersin, Türkiye. saniyemerveaslan@gmail.com.
Merve GoymenFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Türkiye.

Funding

Scientific Research Project Management Unit of Gaziantep University DHF.UT.21.10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, pain, and satisfaction levels of patients treated with different thicknesses of clear aligners among class I maxillary mild crowding cases. Twenty-eight subjects were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 were treated with 0.5 mm-thick aligners and group 2 were treated with 0.75 mm-thick aligners. Maxillary models were printed using a 3-dimensional printer and aligners were produced using a vacuum thermoforming machine. The amount of orthodontic tooth movement was evaluated by comparing pre- and post-treatment digital models and lateral cephalograms taken at the beginning and end of the treatment. Pain and satisfaction levels were measured before aligner insertion, at the 4th hour, 2nd day, 1st week, 1st month and at the end of the treatment. Increases in maxillary intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar widths, and dental arch perimeter were significantly higher in group 2 (p < 0.05). The pain levels peaked at T1 and decreased gradually in both groups; group 2 demonstrated greater pain levels. Group 1 reported significantly greater satisfaction levels (p < 0.05). Aligner thickness is a key determinant of the extent of orthodontic tooth movement. Treatment with a 0.5 mm-thick aligner provides enhanced comfort for patients, but a 0.75 mm-thick aligner yields more efficient treatment results.Trial registration: The trial was registered on https://ClinicalTrials.gov retrospectively with the registration number of NCT06504498, on 16/07/2024.

Indexed as

MalocclusionOrthodontic Appliance DesignOrthodontic Appliances, RemovableTooth Movement TechniquesAdolescentAdultCephalometryFemaleHumansMalePatient SatisfactionTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAligner thicknessClear alignerOrthodontic tooth movementPainPatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID39893227
PMCPMC11787305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.