ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimizing AI models to predict esophageal squamous cell carcinoma risk by incorporating small datasets of soft palate images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Applications of artificial intelligence in postoperative surveillance and management of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is a currently an unmet need for non-invasive methods to predict the risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Previously, we found that specific soft palate morphologies are strongly associated with increased ESCC risk. However, there is currently no artificial intelligence (AI) system that utilizes oral images for ESCC risk assessment. Here, we evaluated three AI models and three fine-tuning approaches with regard to their ESCC predictive power. Our dataset contained 539 cases, which were subdivided into 221 high-risk cases (2491 images) and 318 non-high-risk cases (2524 images). We used 480 cases (4295 images) for the training dataset, and the rest for validation. The Bilinear convolutional neural network (CNN) model (especially when pre-trained on fractal images) demonstrated diagnostic precision that was comparable to or better than other models for distinguishing between high-risk and non-high-risk groups. In addition, when tested with a small number of images containing soft palate data, the model showed high precision: the best AUC model had 0.91 (sensitivity 0.86, specificity 0.79). This study presents a significant advance in the development of an AI-based non-invasive screening tool for the identification of high-risk ESCC patients. The approach may be particularly suitable for institutes with limited medical imaging resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.