ArticleScientific reports2025
Fully automated CFD simulation system research based on design scheme tree.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compared with the remarkable achievements of computer-aided drug discovery systems for drug discovery, the role of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in flow channel design requires further development. While CFD has undergone rapid evolution, the absence of integrated geometry and mesh processing hinders the potential development of advanced applications of this technology. To overcome this limitation, in this paper, the JIACFD toolset is presented, and a fully automated CFD simulation system is established. The simulation system is also constructed on a design scheme tree, which is more in accordance with engineering logic. The control parameter trend analysis method is introduced to select appropriate candidates from the design scheme tree. Additionally, the control parameter trend assumption, which is proven via the Spearman method, is proposed to improve the efficiency of the system. During the verification process for the study case, two independent control parameters exhibit correlating trends, and one control parameter converges when the number of meshes increases, indicating a lack of trend sensitivity. The design scheme tree and trend curve are subsequently utilized to effectively analyze the flow field characteristics of different schemes. Finally, the control parameter trend analysis method is employed to rank the design scheme tree and verify that the ranking of candidates is not dependent on the number of meshes. This paper investigates and verifies the presented system, method, and assumption and explores the possibility of an established system playing a more critical role in performance design work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.