Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39893195›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

Bias-corrected high-resolution temperature and precipitation projections for Canada.

Hebatallah M Abdelmoaty, Chandra Rupa Rajulapati, Sofia D Nerantzaki, Simon Michael Papalexiou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nile basin flow regimes under 21Communications earth & environment · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hebatallah M AbdelmoatyDepartment of Civil Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Chandra Rupa RajulapatiDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada. Chandra.Rajulapati@umanitoba.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3239-8773
Sofia D NerantzakiDepartment of Civil, Geological and Environmental Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Simon Michael PapalexiouDepartment of Civil Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5633-0154

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-resolution precipitation and temperature projections are indispensable for informed decision-making, risk assessment, and planning. Here, we have developed an extensive database (SPQM-CMIP6-CAN) of high-resolution (0.1°) precipitation and temperature projections extending till 2100 at a daily scale for Canada. We employed a novel Semi-Parametric Quantile Mapping (SPQM) methodology to bias-correct the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, Phase-6 (CMIP6) projections for four Shared Socio-economic Pathways. SPQM is simple, yet robust, in reproducing the observed marginal properties, trends, and variability according to future scenarios, while maintaining a smooth transition from observations to projected simulations. The SPQM-CMIP6-CAN database encompasses 693 simulations derived from 34 diverse climate models for precipitation. Similarly, for temperature projections, our database comprises 581 simulations from 27 climate models. These projections are valuable for hydrological, environmental, and ecological studies, offering a comprehensive resource for analyses within these domains. Furthermore, these projections serve as a vital tool for the quantification of uncertainties arising from climate models, their variant configurations, and future scenarios.

Identifiers

PMID39893195
PMCPMC11787352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.