ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhancing safety in surface mine blasting operations with IoT based ground vibration monitoring and prediction system integrated with machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pre-blast prediction of ground vibration in surface mining using rock acoustic impedance and wave attenuation calibrated with in-situ measurements.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Particle peak velocity prediction based on risk-oriented hybrid ensemble learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Innovative Technologies to Improve Occupational Safety in Mining and Construction Industries-Part I.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monitoring and predicting ground vibration levels during blasting operations is essential to safeguard mining sites and surrounding communities. This study introduces an IoT-based ground vibration monitoring device specifically designed for limestone mining operations, combined with machine learning algorithms to predict ground vibration intensity. The primary aim is to provide an efficient predictive tool for anticipating hazardous vibration levels, enabling proactive safety measures. A comparative analysis with the industry-standard Minimate Blaster indicates high accuracy of the IoT device, with percentage errors as low as 0.803% across multiple blasts. The study also employed Support Vector Regression (SVR), Gradient Boosting Regression (GBR), and Random Forest (RF) algorithms to predict Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) values. Among these, the Random Forest model outperformed the others, achieving an R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.