ArticleScientific reports2025
Assessing hazard prediction and risk calibration skills in experienced and novice e-scooter riders.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of hazard perception skills among electric scooter riders in urban environments.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Less experienced e-scooter riders often exhibit risky riding behaviours. Despite this, no studies have examined how riders calibrate risk, respond to hazardous situations, and the impact of riding experience on these skills. To address this, this study assessed hazard prediction and risk calibration in e-scooter riders via bespoke video-based tests featuring real e-scooter footage filmed from the rider's perspective. The first experiment assessed the ability of e-scooter riders to predict hazardous riding scenarios. The second experiment evaluated their proneness to engage in risky riding situations. The results indicated that increased riding experience did not improve riders' hazard prediction skills or reduced their proneness to engage in risky riding. In fact, a higher riding frequency was linked to an increased tendency to engage in risky behaviour in certain scenarios. The results highlight that the typically short duration of e-scooter trips may limit riders' exposure to a variety of hazards, hindering their ability to develop effective risk calibration skills. The observed high propensity to engage in risky riding scenarios, combined with average hazard prediction scores, emphasizes the need for targeted rider training focused on vigilance and risk awareness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.