ArticleNature communications2025
Layer ensemble averaging for fault tolerance in memristive neural networks.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biologically-informed excitatory and inhibitory ratio for robust spiking neural network training.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Layer ensemble averaging for fault tolerance in memristive neural networks.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial neural networks have advanced due to scaling dimensions, but conventional computing struggles with inefficiencies due to memory bottlenecks. In-memory computing architectures using memristor devices offer promise but face challenges due to hardware non-idealities. This work proposes layer ensemble averaging-a hardware-oriented fault tolerance scheme for improving inference performance of non-ideal memristive neural networks programmed with pre-trained solutions. Simulations on an image classification task and hardware experiments on a continual learning problem with a custom 20,000-device prototyping platform show significant performance gains, outperforming prior methods at similar redundancy levels and overheads. For the image classification task with 20% stuck-at faults, accuracy improves from 40% to 89.6% (within 5% of baseline), and for the continual learning problem, accuracy improves from 55% to 71% (within 1% of baseline). The proposed scheme is broadly applicable to accelerators based on a variety of different non-volatile device technologies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.