Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39893139›Full record

ReviewThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2025

Use of lecanemab and donanemab in the Canadian healthcare system: Evidence, challenges, and areas for future research.

Eric E Smith, Natalie A Phillips, Howard H Feldman, Michael Borrie, Aravind Ganesh, Alexandre Henri-Bhargava, Philippe Desmarais, Andrew Frank, AmanPreet Badhwar, Laura Barlow and 49 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Lecanemab use in Chinese patients with Alzheimer's disease: a 12-month multicenter real-world study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Observational
  3. Lecanemab use for early Alzheimer disease in Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Are Appropriate Use Recommendations useful in clinical practice?The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

59 authors.

Eric E SmithUniversity of Calgary, Canada. Electronic address: eesmith@ucalgary.ca.
Natalie A PhillipsConcordia University, Canada.
Howard H FeldmanAlzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study, Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, United States.
Michael BorrieWestern University, Canada.
Aravind GaneshUniversity of Calgary, Canada.
Alexandre Henri-BhargavaUniversity of British Columbia, University of Victoria, Island Health, Canada.
Philippe DesmaraisCentre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Canada.
Andrew FrankBruyère Health Research Institute and University of Ottawa, Canada.
AmanPreet BadhwarCentre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Université de Montreal, Canada.
Laura BarlowUniversity of British Columbia, Canada.
Robert BarthaWestern University, Canada.
Sarah BestWestern University, Canada.
Jennifer BethellKITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, University of Toronto, Canada.
Jaspreet BhanguWestern University, Canada.
Sandra E BlackSunnybrook Research Institute, Canada.
Christian BoctiUniversité de Sherbrooke, Canada.
Susan E BronskillInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), Canada.
Amer M BurhanOntario Shores Centre and University of Toronto, Canada.
Frederic CalonUniversité Laval (Faculté de pharmacie), Canada.
Richard CamicioliUniversity of Alberta, Canada.
Barry CampbellUniversity of Manitoba, Canada.
D Louis CollinsMcGill University, Canada.
Mahsa DadarMcGill University, Canada.
Mari L DeMarcoProvidence Health Care, University of British Columbia, Canada.
Simon DucharmeMcGill University - Douglas Institute, Canada.
Simon DuchesneLaval University, Canada.
Gillian EinsteinUniversity of Toronto, Canada.
John D FiskDalhousie University, Canada.
Jodie R GawrylukUniversity of Victoria, Canada.
Linda GrossmanPerson with lived experience, Canada.
Zahinoor IsmailUniversity of Calgary, Canada.
Inbal ItzhakLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Canada.
Manish JoshiUniversity of Calgary, Canada.
Arthur HarrisonPerson with lived experience, Canada.
Edeltraut KrögerUniversité Laval, Canada.
Sanjeev KumarUniversity of Toronto, Canada.
Robert LaforceLaval University, Canada.
Krista L LanctotSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Canada.
Meghan LauPerson with lived experience, Canada.
Linda LeeMcMaster University, Canada.
Mario MasellisDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Canada.
Fadi MassoudCentre Hospitalier Charles LeMoyne / University of Sherbrooke, Canada.
Sara B MitchellUniversity of Toronto, Canada.
Manuel Montero-OdassoDepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, Canada.
Karen Myers BarnettPerson with lived experience, Canada.
Haakon B NygaardUniversity of British Columbia, Canada.
Stephen H PasternakWestern University, Parkwood Institute, Canada.
Jody PetersPerson with lived experience, Canada.
M Natasha RajahToronto Metropolitan University, Canada.
Julie M RobillardUniversity of British Columbia, Canada.
Ken RockwoodDalhousie University, Canada.
Pedro Rosa-NetoMcGill University, Canada.
Dallas P SeitzUniversity of Calgary, Canada.
Jean-Paul SoucyMcGill University, Canada.
Shanna C TrenamanDalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health, Canada.
Cheryl L WellingtonDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Canada.
Aicha ZademUniversité de Sherbrooke, Canada.
Howard ChertkowRotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre, Canada.
Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lecanemab and donanemab are monoclonal antibody therapies that remove amyloid-beta from the brain. They are the first therapies that alter a fundamental mechanism, amyloid-beta deposition, in Alzheimer disease (AD). To inform Canadian decisions on approval and use of these drugs, the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging commissioned Work Groups to review evidence on the efficacy and safety of these new therapies, as well as their projected impacts on Canadian dementia systems of care. We included persons with lived experience with Alzheimer disease in the discussion about the benefits and harms. Our review of the trial publications found high quality evidence of statistically significant group differences, but also recognized that there are mixed views on the clinical relevance of the observed differences and the value of therapy for individual patients. The drugs are intended for persons with early AD, at a stage of mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia. If patients are treated, then confirmation of AD by positron emission tomography or cerebrospinal fluid analysis and monitoring for risk of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities was recommended, as done in the clinical trials, although it would strain Canadian resource capacity. More data are needed to determine the size of the potentially eligible treatment population in Canada.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAmyloid beta-PeptidesCanadaDelivery of Health CareHumansAmyloid beta-PeptidesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizeddonanemabAlzheimerʼs diseaseClinical trialsDonanemabLecanemab

Identifiers

PMID39893139
PMCPMC12184013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.