SynthesisBehavioural brain research2025
The role of the intraparietal sulcus in numeracy: A review of parietal lesion cases.
Synthesis in Behavioural brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lesion-symptom mapping reveals differential relationships between language and precise versus approximate numeracy.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prominent theories of numeracy link the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) to approximate representations of quantity that undergird basic math abilities. The goal of this review is to better understand the neural basis of mathematical cognition through the lens of acalculia, by identifying numeracy-focused single case studies of patients with parietal lesions and testing for causal relationships between numeracy impairments and the locus of parietal damage. A systematic literature review identified 27 single case studies with left parietal lesions and categorized administered tasks across four numeracy domains: Approximation, Calculation, Ordinality/Cardinality, and Transcoding. We compared published lesion images by drawing a sphere at the inferred center-of-mass and assigning each case to an anatomical group (IPS or Other Parietal damage) based on overlap with left IPS and original anatomical description. We performed Fisher's Exact Test to compare behavioral performance on each numeracy domain between the two groups. As an exploratory follow-up, we used Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) to identify sites of damage within parietal cortex preferentially associated with impairments in each domain. We found that Approximation impairments were significantly more frequent in the IPS group (p = .003). The exploratory ALE analysis revealed that only Approximation impairment cases significantly overlapped with the IPS, while impairments in other domains were localized to different regions of the parietal lobe. Based on the pattern of impairments shown across these cases, we conclude that damage to the left IPS is linked to impairments in approximation ability specifically. Our findings support theoretical claims linking IPS to magnitude representation, but do not provide evidence that IPS critically underpins performance across all numeracy tasks. Instead, our findings are more compatible with models of dissociable circuits of numerical processing within the parietal lobe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.