ArticlePsychiatry research2025
Stress sensitivity in women with a history of recurrent versus first-episode major depression.
Article in Psychiatry research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering a chitosan-based nanoemulsion for non-invasive CNS-targeting approach: dual neuroprotection against epileptic and depressive disorders.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Sex/Gender Differences in the Effects of Childhood Abuse on Future Risk of Depression: Longitudinal Evidence from the Global Flourishing Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Approximately 50 % of people who recover from an initial episode of major depressive disorder (MDD) experience a recurrence, and the risk for recurrence increases with each additional episode. Consistent with the stress sensitization model, there is evidence that whereas initial MDD onsets are often preceded by major negative life events, recurrences are often triggered by more minor events. However, it is unclear whether this is due to increased frequency of minor life events, increased reactivity to these events, or both. The current study examined these questions in a community sample of 227 adult women with a history of recurrent MDD (rMDD, n = 77), first-episode MDD (fMDD, n = 38), or no history of MDD (n = 112). Women were assessed at baseline and every six months for two years (5 assessments total). Throughout the follow-up, major and minor life events were assessed using contextual threat interviews and depressive symptoms were assessed using a self-report questionnaire. Regarding event frequency, minor events were more common than major events, and the rMDD group experienced more negative events overall (both major and minor) than the never depressed group but not the fMDD group. Regarding stress reactivity, results of linear mixed modeling revealed that whereas all three groups exhibited similar increases in depressive symptoms following major events, only women in the rMDD group experienced significant increases in depressive symptoms following minor events. These findings show that not only are women with rMDD living in more stressful contexts, but they are also more reactive to minor stressors, increasing risk for future depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.