ArticleClinical neurology and neurosurgery2025
Optimizing stroke prediction using gated recurrent unit and feature selection in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Article in Clinical neurology and neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stroke incidence, presentation, and outcomes in malaria: a review of current evidence.Malaria journal · 2025Review
- Stacked Ensemble Learning for Classification of Parkinson's Disease Using Telemonitoring Vocal Features.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStroke remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide, with African populations bearing a disproportionately high burden due to limited healthcare infrastructure. Early prediction and intervention are critical to reducing stroke outcomes. This study developed and evaluated a stroke prediction system using Gated Recurrent Units (GRU), a variant of Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), leveraging the Afrocentric Stroke Investigative Research and Education Network (SIREN) dataset.
methodThe study utilized secondary data from the SIREN dataset, comprising 4236 records with 29 phenotypes. Feature selection reduced these to 15 optimal phenotypes based on their significance to stroke occurrence. The GRU model, designed with 128 input neurons and four hidden layers (64, 32, 16, and 8 neurons), was trained and evaluated using 150 epochs, a batch size of 8, and metrics such as accuracy, AUC, and prediction time. Comparisons were made with traditional machine learning algorithms (Logistic Regression, SVM, KNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks.
resultsThe GRU-based system achieved a performance accuracy of 77.48 %, an AUC of 0.84, and a prediction time of 0.43 seconds, outperforming all other models. Logistic Regression achieved 73.58 %, while LSTM reached 74.88 % but with a longer prediction time of 2.23 seconds. Feature selection significantly improved the model's performance compared to using all 29 phenotypes.
conclusionThe GRU-based system demonstrated superior performance in stroke prediction, offering an efficient and scalable tool for healthcare. Future research should focus on integrating unstructured data, validating the model on diverse populations, and exploring hybrid architectures to enhance predictive accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.