ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2025
Neurostimulation improves reading and alters communication within reading networks in dyslexia.
Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Culture Shapes the Neural Functional Alteration and Its Development in Children With Dyslexia: A Cross-Linguistic Meta-Analysis.Developmental science · 2026Pooled it
- Probing the linguistic cerebellum: a qualitative review of the effects of cerebellar neurostimulation on language processing.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Emerging technologies and neuroscience-based approaches in dyslexia: a narrative review toward integrative and personalized solutions.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- Resting-State Functional MRI in Dyslexia: A Systematic Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Neurostimulation improves reading and alters communication within reading networks in dyslexia.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The left temporo-parietal cortex (TPC) is critical for phonological decoding during reading and appears hypoactive in dyslexia. Therefore, a promising approach to alleviating phonological deficits in dyslexia is to modulate left TPC functioning. However, it is unclear how neurostimulation alters activity and network interactions in dyslexia. To address this gap, we combined facilitatory transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the left TPC in adults with dyslexia with an overt word and pseudoword reading task during functional neuroimaging. We found TMS-induced improvements in pseudoword reading, reduced contributions of right-hemispheric regions during reading, and substantial changes between the core reading nodes and an extended network involving the right cerebellum. Stronger coupling between temporo-occipital and frontal cortices was further directly linked to improvements in pseudoword reading. Collectively, we provide evidence for a crucial role of the left TPC for phonological decoding and show that TMS can successfully modulate reading networks to improve reading in dyslexia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.