ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2025
Efficacy and safety of anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin in patients homozygous for Factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factor V Leiden Mutation Diagnosed After the Onset of DVT During Pregnancy in a Woman of Half-Japanese, Half-European Descent.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with venous thrombosis and inherited thrombophilia.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Factor V Leiden (FVL) and prothrombin G20210A mutation (PGM) are the most common types of inherited thrombophilia, predisposing to increased venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk. The homozygous and compound heterozygous forms of these mutations are extremely rare. While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have replaced vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) as the primary treatment for VTE, data on their use in patients with high-risk hereditary thrombophilia are limited. To compare the efficacy and safety of DOACs vs. VKA in patients with high-risk hereditary thrombophilia, including FVL and PGM. This retrospective cohort study included adults with homozygous/compound heterozygous FVL and/or PGM who experienced a thrombotic event between 2000 and 2022. The primary outcome was the incidence of recurrent thrombosis in patients with high-risk inherited thrombophilia treated with DOACs versus VKAs. The secondary outcome included a comparison of rates of bleeding complications between these groups. The types of bleeding were defined according to the ISTH criteria. Of 56 patients included 28 received DOACs and 28 received VKAs. There was no significant difference in recurrent VTE rates (1/28, 3.6% DOAC group vs. 0/28, 0% VKA group) or major bleeding (1/28, 3.6% DOAC group vs. 1/28, 3.6% VKA group). This is the largest cohort of patients with high-risk hereditary thrombophilia, providing valuable insights into DOAC use in this group. The findings suggest that DOACs may represent an effective and safe alternative to VKAs. Further research is warranted to confirm these results and optimize anticoagulant management in this challenging patient group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39891866What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.