SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2025
Single-surgeon training of 14 novice surgeons in robotic cholecystectomy: a study of 300 consecutive cases, assessing training outcomes and surgical performance.
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Robotic curriculum and development strategies in robotic abdominal surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of the learning curve and mentoring in robotic pancreatectomy: transitioning from novice to expert robotic surgeon.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Robotic-assisted surgery for acute abdominal emergencies: a systematic review of 1142 cases.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Feasibility and safety of supervised robotic training for minor general surgical procedures: a prospective single-center study with early learning curve analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robotic cholecystectomy during surgical training: learning curve and perioperative outcomes of 441 consecutive cases in a high-volume teaching center.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- A mixed-method survey study evaluating two robotic surgical training courses in Germany.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Early Experience with Robotic Pancreatic Resections: a Retrospective Cohort Study of 20 Consecutive Cases.Maedica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is a rapidly evolving field, requiring comprehensive training for widespread adoption. The aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of RAS cholecystectomy training in improving the technical skills and confidence of novice surgeons. Furthermore, the study examined the transferability of RAS skills to laparoscopic skills, the role of RAS cholecystectomies in reducing errors and improving patient outcomes, and identified factors that predict a successful transition from traditional laparoscopic surgery to RAS surgery. The RAST curriculum includes multimodal learning content delivered through a cloud-based platform, with three steps: basic training, simulation exercises, and structured on-patient training in the operating room. One general surgeon was trained on the Intuitive Surgical da Vinci system and assisted in performing 10 da Vinci-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomies. In the first 300 patients who underwent robotic cholecystectomy, there were no major complications, conversions to laparoscopy, or open surgeries. The RAST curriculum demonstrates feasibility in providing a comprehensive and effective RAS training experience for surgical residents, reducing the need for extensive travel and high costs. The RAST curriculum is a promising solution for training surgical residents in RAS, with potential for widespread adoption and scalability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39891856What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.