ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
Detecting mild cognitive impairment by applying integrated random forest to finger tapping.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Detection of Cognitive Impairment Using Time-Frequency Analysis of Fine Motor Accelerometry.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Application of resting-state EEG theta /alpha power ratio analysis for diagnosing amnestic mild cognitive impairment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early detection of dementia is essential to reduce the decline in quality of life (QoL) and the increase in medical and nursing care costs associated with dementia in an aging society. In this study, we aimed to develop a simple screening test for mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a preliminary stage of dementia, by creating an analytical method to accurately detect MCI through finger-tapping measurement. We extracted 248 characteristics from the finger-tapping waveforms of 182 MCI patients and 352 normal controls, applying five conventional classification methods along with an improved Random Forest (RF) method proposed in this study (Integrated RF). In the proposed method, the RF classification model for the MCI and normal control groups is supplementally integrated with the RF classification model for the Alzheimer's disease and normal control groups to generate a new classification model. When comparing the discrimination accuracy of each method, the proposed method achieved the highest accuracy, with an F1-score of 0.795 (recall = 0.778 and precision = 0.814). These results demonstrate the potential of finger-tapping measurement as a highly accurate screening test for MCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39891822What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.