Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39891749›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2025

On-site breakfast provision in early childhood education and care (ECEC) services in Australia: a multi-method investigation.

Seon Y Park, Miaobing Zheng, Kathleen E Lacy, Karen J Campbell, Penelope Love

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Seon Y ParkInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences (SENS), Deakin University, Geelong Waurn Ponds Campus, 75 Pigdons Road, Geelong, VIC, 3216, Australia. s.park@deakin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4952-0069
Miaobing ZhengInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences (SENS), Deakin University, Geelong Waurn Ponds Campus, 75 Pigdons Road, Geelong, VIC, 3216, Australia.
Kathleen E LacyInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences (SENS), Deakin University, Geelong Waurn Ponds Campus, 75 Pigdons Road, Geelong, VIC, 3216, Australia.
Karen J CampbellInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences (SENS), Deakin University, Geelong Waurn Ponds Campus, 75 Pigdons Road, Geelong, VIC, 3216, Australia.
Penelope LoveInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences (SENS), Deakin University, Geelong Waurn Ponds Campus, 75 Pigdons Road, Geelong, VIC, 3216, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreakfast is vital for young children's health. In Australia, breakfast is often provided in government-approved Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) services. However, research on breakfast provision in Australian ECEC services is limited. This study aimed to evaluate breakfast quality and enablers and barriers of breakfast provision in these settings.

methodsA multi-method, sequential explanatory design was employed, including survey, on-site visits, and semi-structured interviews. ECEC services offering breakfast in Victoria, Australia, participated in an online survey to assess breakfast provision quality based on Victorian Health Eating Advisory Service (HEAS) guidelines. Multivariate logistic regression was utilised to identify the relationship between breakfast quality and service characteristics. A subset of services participated in 1-day observational visits and 30-min semi-structured interviews. The on-site visits observed breakfast foods and environments, while interviews explored enablers or barriers of breakfast provision.

resultsFifty ECEC services participated in the online survey, with common breakfast items such as cereal, bread, and milk being frequently provided, while fruits and vegetables were among the least common items offered. Only 10-16% of services met the HEAS definitions of high-quality standards, and these centres were mostly located in socioeconomically advantaged areas. Of these, four services participated in the on-site observation phase, where the use of full-cream milk and multigrain bread was commonly noted. Additionally, eight interviews (two from each centre) were conducted to explore enablers and barriers to healthy breakfast provision. Key enablers included government funding and the use of nutritional guidelines, while barriers involved time constraints, budget limitations, staffing shortages, and insufficient confidence in applying and utilising nutrition guidance.

conclusionFruits and vegetables are rarely provided at breakfast in ECEC settings, and only a small number of ECEC services met high-quality breakfast standards, with those in socio-economically advantaged areas more likely to achieve these standards. Targeted interventions, particularly in disadvantaged areas, are essential to improve the quality of breakfast provision, with a focus on including fruits and vegetables in line with guidelines. While the findings of this study had jurisdictional limitations, this study highlighted the importance of addressing issues such as time constraints, budget limitations, and staffing shortages, along with establishing practical and clear breakfast guidelines to enhance the quality of breakfast provision in ECEC settings. Further research is needed to explore specific and actionable strategies for implementing these improvements.

Indexed as

BreakfastFood ServicesAustraliaChild Day Care CentersChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleNutrition PolicySurveys and QuestionnairesVictoriachildcareEarly childhood education servicesECECEnablers and barriers of healthy breakfast provisionOnsite breakfast provision quality

Identifiers

PMID39891749
PMCPMC11787215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.