SynthesisCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2025
Novel combination therapy for platinum-eligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- First-Line Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab vs Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- 'BJUI Clinical Dilemma': Recurrent high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer in 2026.BJU international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrate the promising impact of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapies on locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, comparative data on the efficacy and toxicity of different ICI-based combinations are lacking. This study aims to compare the efficacy of first-line ICI-based combination therapies for locally advanced or metastatic UC using phase 3 RCT data. In November 2023, three databases were searched for RCTs evaluating oncological outcomes in patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC who were treated with first-line ICI-based combination therapies. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORRs), complete response rates (CRRs), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Subgroup analyses were based on PD-L1 status and cisplatin eligibility. The NMA included five RCTs. Enfortumab vedotin (EV) + pembrolizumab ranked the highest for improving OS (100%), PFS (100%), ORR (96%), and CRR (96%), followed by nivolumab + chemotherapy. EV + pembrolizumab combination superiority held across PD-L1 status and cisplatin eligibility. In patients who are cisplatin-eligible, EV + pembrolizumab significantly improved OS (HR: 0.68, 95%CI 0.47-0.99) and PFS (HR: 0.67, 95%CI 0.49-0.92) compared to nivolumab + chemotherapy. Durvalumab + tremelimumab was the safest combination for severe TRAEs, and EV + pembrolizumab ranked second. Our analyses support EV + pembrolizumab combination as a first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic UC. Thus, EV + pembrolizumab may become a guideline-changing standard treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.