Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39891694›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

Influence of surgeon experience on the incidence of tip fold-over with slim preformed cochlear implant electrodes.

Esther Knörle, Caterina Vazzana, Timo Stöver, Silke Helbig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Esther KnörleDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, D-60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Caterina VazzanaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, D-60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Timo StöverDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, D-60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Silke HelbigDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, D-60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Silke.Helbig@unimedizin-ffm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9666-4028

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess whether increasing experience with implantation of a thin preformed electrode array for perimodiolar insertion reduces the incidence of tip fold-over (TFO).

methodsThe retrospective study included 100 patients who received a cochlear implant (CI) with the Slim Modiolar (SM) electrode array (Cochlear, Sydney, Australia) at a university CI centre between November 2015 and December 2022. Postoperative radiological imaging was performed to verify electrode position. Surgical reports and radiological images were reviewed and the incidence of TFO was analyzed for three experienced CI surgeons. In addition, the incidence of intraoperative measurements showing evidence of electrode malposition and the mean duration of surgery over time were documented.

results129 SM implantations in 100 patients were included. In seven cases (5.4%) TFO was radiologically detected and successfully revised. In eight cases (6.2%), electrophysiological measurements indicated misplacement and the position was corrected during the same surgery. For one surgeon, five out of 67 implantations (7.5%) were affected by TFO, with the frequency of this complication decreasing over time. The average surgery time for all surgeons was 122.2 (± 44.2) minutes, with two surgeons showing a decrease over time.

conclusionThe results show a tendency that the SM electrodes can be implanted with a lower complication rate and faster over time. Therefore, it can be assumed that the implantation of the SM electrode requires a certain amount of practice, even for experienced surgeons. As intraoperative electrophysiological measurements detected 71.4% of all radiologically confirmed TFOs, their use is highly recommended.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsElectrodes, ImplantedPostoperative ComplicationsSurgeonsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleCochlear implantationPreformed electrode - perimodiolarSlim modiolarSurgical experienceTip fold-over

Identifiers

PMID39891694
PMCPMC12321916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.