ArticleNeuro-oncology2025
GBMPurity: A machine learning tool for estimating glioblastoma tumor purity from bulk RNA-sequencing data.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Based Classification of Gliomas and Tumor Grades with SHAP-Guided Feature Interpretation.Genes · 2026Article
- A guide to transcriptomic deconvolution in cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Multi-Omics Approaches in Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Rethinking tumor purity estimation in the era of AI.Neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Deep learning based deconvolution methods: A systematic review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGlioblastoma (GBM) presents a significant clinical challenge due to its aggressive nature and extensive heterogeneity. Tumor purity, the proportion of malignant cells within a tumor, is an important covariate for understanding the disease, having direct clinical relevance or obscuring signal of the malignant portion in molecular analyses of bulk samples. However, current methods for estimating tumor purity are nonspecific and technically demanding. Therefore, we aimed to build a reliable and accessible purity estimator for GBM.
methodsWe developed GBMPurity, a deep learning model specifically designed to estimate the purity of IDH-wild type primary GBM from bulk RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data. The model was trained using simulated pseudobulk tumors of known purity from labeled single-cell data acquired from the GBmap resource. The performance of GBMPurity was evaluated and compared to several existing tools using independent datasets.
resultsGBMPurity outperformed existing tools, achieving a mean absolute error of 0.15 and a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.88 on validation datasets. We demonstrate the utility of GBMPurity through inference on bulk RNA-seq samples and observe reduced purity of the proneural molecular subtype relative to the classical, attributed to the increased presence of healthy brain cells.
conclusionsGBMPurity provides a reliable and accessible tool for estimating tumor purity from bulk RNA-seq data, enhancing the interpretation of bulk RNA-seq data and offering valuable insights into GBM biology. To facilitate the use of this model by the wider research community, GBMPurity is available as a web-based tool at: https://gbmdeconvoluter.leeds.ac.uk/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.