ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2025
Pandemic Preparedness: Analyzing National Plans for Respiratory Pathogen Pandemics in the Americas Region.
Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring pandemic preparedness through public perception and its impact on health service quality, attitudes, and healthcare image.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- 10 Years of Severe Acute Respiratory Infections Network (SARInet plus): Accomplishments and Way Forward.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo identify gaps and define priority actions to strengthen national pandemic preparedness and response plans, we assessed the concordance between national plans for respiratory pathogens against the World Health Organization (WHO) pandemic checklist and the States Parties Annual Report (SPAR) in the Americas.
methodsIn this retrospective, semiquantitative study, we reviewed the most recent respiratory pandemic plans for 35 Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) member states and assessed their concordance with (1) actionable guidelines in WHO pandemic checklist and (2) International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005) core capacities using the latest SPAR tool. We developed 25 tracking questions to identify gaps, strengths, and opportunities for improvement using a 5-point scale. We compared the average SPAR score and the Pandemic Plans score to assess areas of convergence and variance between preparedness and capacities.
resultsWe analyzed 35 respiratory pandemic plans (2005-2024): 29 were influenza specific, 5 were COVID-19 specific, and 1 was not pathogen specific. Most national plans showed limited alignment with the content recommended in the pandemic checklist. The lowest concordance between plans and checklist was in public health and social measures (80% of plans with score of 1); emergency, logistics and supply chain management (74%); and research and development (71%). Conversely, the strongest subcomponents were policy, legal, and normative instruments (45% of plans with score 4 or 5); coordination (46%); and surveillance: early detection and assessment (43%).
conclusionsIt is recommended that countries build on the strengths of their national pandemic preparedness and response plans and update them using PRET module 1. This will support countries advance the capacities required by the IHR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.