ArticleDevelopment, growth & differentiation2025
Mild cryoinjury in zebrafish fin induces regenerative response without blastema formation.
Article in Development, growth & differentiation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative multi-omic analysis reveals conserved and derived mechanisms of fin and limb regeneration.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Mild cryoinjury in zebrafish fin induces regenerative response without blastema formation.Development, growth & differentiation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that tissue regeneration induces expression of genes that play important roles in regeneration. Recently, several studies have identified regeneration-response enhancers (RREs) that activate gene expression by tissue injury. Particularly, we showed that RREs contain two transcription factor-binding motifs: a bHLH transcription factor-binding motif, an E-box, and an AP-1/bZIP transcription factor-binding motif, a 12-O-Tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate response element (TRE). However, the triggers and subsequent signals generated by injury are still unclear. In this study, we analyzed RRE activation using various injury models. Although inter-ray incisions and skin exfoliation injuries did not activate RREs or regeneration genes, the fin puncture injury activated RREs and several regeneration-response genes. After fin puncture injury, msxc was activated only on the proximal side of the hole where blastema-like tissue was formed, whereas RREs, junbb, and fibronectin 1b (fn1b) were activated on both the proximal and distal sides, implying that activation of RREs, junbb, and fn1b is independent of blastema formation. Here, we also established a mild cryoinjury method. After this injury, transient vascular destruction, an increase in cell death, and an accumulation of myeloid cells were observed; however, no major morphological damage was observed. Importantly, msxc was not induced by cryoinjury, whereas fn1b, junbb, and 1.8 k RRE (-1.8 kb promoter of fn1b) were activated, suggesting that cryoinjury induces the responses of fn1b, junbb, and 1.8 k RRE without forming the blastema. Thus, our study shows that the cryoinjury model and the RRE transgenic (Tg) zebrafish may provide a useful platform for exploring injury signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.