Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39891429›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of surgery2025

Preoperative stereotactic radiotherapy to prevent pancreatic fistula in high-risk patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (FIBROPANC): prospective multicentre phase II single-arm trial.

Leonoor V Wismans, Tessa E Hendriks, J Annelie Suurmeijer, Joost J Nuyttens, Anna M Bruynzeel, Martijn P Intven, Lydi M van Driel, Roel Haen, Roeland F de Wilde, Bas Groot Koerkamp and 13 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Leonoor V WismansErasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7009-7034
Tessa E HendriksDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0007-7418-3056
J Annelie SuurmeijerDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2972-5622
Joost J NuyttensDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0002-5021-1597
Anna M BruynzeelDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7542-8920
Martijn P IntvenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5068-5517
Lydi M van DrielDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0616-7349
Roel HaenErasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Roeland F de WildeErasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0003-0444-8697
Bas Groot KoerkampErasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1917-6973
Olivier R BuschDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9605-6831
Jaap StokerCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9822-3784
Joanne VerheijCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1283-630X
Arantza FarinaCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4307-1568
Onno J de BoerCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michail DoukasErasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ignace H de HinghDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2112-4390
Daan J LipsDepartment of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7515-9276
Erwin van der HarstDepartment of Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1317-5614
Geertjan van TienhovenDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2516-2263
Casper H van EijckErasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9511-2157
Marc G BesselinkDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2650-9350
Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative pancreatic fistula is the main driver of morbidity and mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy. In high-risk patients, the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula approaches 50%, whereas it is below 5% in patients with pancreatic cancer who receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of preoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy on the pancreatic neck transection margin in high-risk patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula.

methodsIn this prospective multicentre open-label single-arm trial (progressing from a safety run-in phase to a phase II design), patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for neoplasms other than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma received a single preoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy dose of 12 Gy. Primary endpoints included safety (less than or equal to 15% grade 3-5 toxicity), feasibility (a significant change in pancreatic texture measured using a durometer), and efficacy (a 15% reduction in the grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula rate compared with patients from the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit who were eligible but not included in this study). Secondary endpoints assessed tissue fibrosis (collagen density).

resultsOverall, 38 patients were included, of whom 33 (87%) completed the study protocol and were included in the per-protocol analysis. The safety cut-off was met, with 3% grade 3-5 toxicity. Pancreatic tissue treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy showed increased firmness using a durometer (median of 47 (interquartile range 36-57) versus 37 (interquartile range 30-41) Shore OO units; P < 0.001) and a higher collagen density (median of 6.1% (interquartile range 4.4%-9.5%) versus 4.6% (interquartile range 2.5%-7.4%); P = 0.003). The grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula rate with stereotactic body radiotherapy was 57.6% (95% c.i. 41% to 74%), compared with 34% (95% c.i. 27% to 42%) in audit controls (P = 0.011).

conclusionPreoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy is safe in high-risk patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy and increases parenchymal firmness and fibrosis, but fails to show evidence of efficacy.

Indexed as

Pancreatic FistulaPancreatic NeoplasmsPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative ComplicationsPreoperative CareRadiosurgeryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID39891429
PMCPMC11785728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.